Managers buried under raw applications
Incomplete information, weak pitches, unstructured documents.
FundGate collects applications in one format, runs each through AI scoring and carries a startup from the first email to the portfolio report. Your team works on deals instead of reconciling spreadsheets.
Incomplete information, weak pitches, unstructured documents.
Email, spreadsheets and chats instead of a system — hours spent picking what to open.
After investing, startups disappear. Traction and metrics are collected by hand.
Not "one more tool for the team", but a perimeter where the whole deal flow is visible and every decision keeps its reasoning and its date.
Every application arrives in one format and in one place. None of them stays in a manager’s personal inbox or disappears when the team changes.
For every startup you can see who reviewed it, what the investment committee decided and on which data. A year later you can revisit it without rebuilding context from chats.
Portfolio state, stages, metrics and dynamics come from the same records the team works in — not from a separate spreadsheet someone maintains by hand.
A new analyst joins a process that already exists: same stages, same fields, same evaluation criteria. Screening quality no longer depends on who picked up the application.
Decision quality improves in a day. Your team gets its time back for the work that matters.
Scattered work. Delayed decisions.
One system. Faster decisions.
The five steps an ordinary working day is made of. Not one of them requires keeping email, Excel and three chats open at the same time.
New applications are already laid out as cards — with score, risks and attached documents. It is immediately clear which three are worth opening first.
Instead of reading a pitch deck from scratch — checking a ready analysis: strengths, red flags, what the application is missing.
The startup moves across the kanban: screening → due diligence → investment committee. Comments and files stay on the card, not in a chat thread.
The investment memo is generated from the card. What remains is to proofread it and add your own view — not to assemble a document from scratch for two days.
After the investment the startup updates its metrics through its own account, and changes from working chats reach the manager for approval.
One product — one problem — one tangible benefit. Start with a single module and expand whenever you are ready.
a smart pitch intake form
A widget for your website where startups submit a structured application — and you receive the data in the format you need.
We embed SmartForm on your website. Startups submit applications through a familiar interface.
SmartVal automatically analyses every application: scoring, risks, memo. Managers receive a ready-made card.
Managers move startups through CRM stages. Every history, document and decision lives in one place.
After investment, the startup moves to the portfolio. Metrics update automatically.
Overall readiness score for working with investors and passing initial screening.
After scoring, the project enters the network of partner funds across CA with a structured assessment.
On request a pipeline of research agents starts up: it gathers public data on the team, product, market and competitors, cross-checks it against what the startup wrote in the application, and returns a report.
Public profiles, past experience and roles — cross-checked against what the application claims.
Who else solves this problem, how the product differs, how plausible the claimed market size is.
Website, apps, mentions and activity — what confirms traction and what contradicts the deck.
A PDF with findings, confidence levels and links — every claim can be verified.
Gaps between the application and what was actually found are listed separately — that list is exactly where a conversation with the founder should start.
The base perimeter — form, records and pipeline — comes up quickly, because the platform is already running. Most of the time goes into agreeing application fields, funnel stages and evaluation criteria around your process.
Yes. The common path is SmartForm first, so applications arrive in one format, then AI scoring, then the CRM with investment committee and portfolio. The modules also work on their own.
Scoring weights and criteria are configured around the fund’s investment strategy: whether team, traction or market matters most to you. The final score follows your rules, not a universal template.
Fund data is closed behind the organization perimeter and user roles. Other funds in the network do not see your comments, evaluations or committee decisions — the network is shared only at the level of incoming applications.
They stay in your pipeline with a status and the reasoning for the rejection. If a startup is relevant to another fund in the network, it goes there through its own application, not by handing over your data.
Request a demo — we will show how FundGate works on your data. 30 minutes that will save your team hundreds of hours.